Washington State Law Enforcement Instructors Association opposes I-1639!

(Shared Post)
IMPORTANT NEWS! This was just released from the Washington State Law Enforcement Instructors Association. They are the the professionals tasked with training all of the other law enforcement officers:

"WSLEFIA Opposes Initiative 1639

Initiative 1639 is being promoted as a public safety measure; those actually working law enforcement know that IT WILL DO NOTHING TO STOP A SINGLE CRIME. This initiative has nothing to do with "assault weapons" and is directed only at our good citizens who already pass multiple background checks before owning a firearm.

The Washington State Law Enforcement Instructors Association (WSLEFIA) opposes Initiative 1639. I-1639 harms law enforcement officers and all citizens of Washington:

I-1639 creates a new crime of "Community Endangerment" and there is NO law enforcement exemption. If a law enforcement officer should fail to secure either a personal or duty firearm as prescribed by I-1639 then that officer may be subject to felony criminal charges. Even a department-issued firearm must be secured with a trigger lock or in "secure storage." The trunk of a patrol car is not specified as secure storage.

I-1639 requires a 10 day wait for law enforcement officers who wish to buy a semiautomatic rifle, whether for personal or duty purposes. There is no exemption for either a commissioned officer or a Concealed Pistol License.

I-1639 requires that law enforcement officers attend a "safety" training class before purchasing any semiauto rifle. There is no exemption for law enforcement commissioned personnel and no recognition of either department or BLEA academy training.

I-1639 would require that a law enforcement officer who sells a semiauto rifle to another officer go to a firearm dealer and pay fees. The purchasing officer must wait 10 days, pass additional background checks, and show proof of "safety" training.

I-1639 targets law-abiding citizens--not criminals--by creating a new law that would make the innocent victim subject to CRIMINAL charges if his firearm is accessed by a prohibited person. The ugliness of shaming and blaming the victim of a crime should never be made law. I-1639 ignores the criminals while attacking the victims of theft.
Law enforcement officers will be made to investigate the victims of crime rather than pursuing the perpetrators of crimes.

I-1639 falsely demonizes all semiautomatic sporting rifles as "assault rifles"--the rifles they wish to deny to the public are the most common sporting and hunting firearms--the type of firearms LEAST likely to be used in crimes--this fact is supported by both FBI and Washington State crime statistics.
Youth rifles, plinkers, collector firearms, hunting and self-defense rifles--if they are semiautomatic, I-1639 will re-classify them as "assault rifles."

I-1639 strips adults under age 21 of their right to self-defense. Law-abiding young adults will no longer be able to possess any modern defensive firearm, neither handgun nor rifle.
I-1639 attacks our safest and best-trained firearm users--licensed and safety trained hunters--by prohibiting the use of modern sporting rifles by those age 18-20.

I-1639 would unlawfully seize semiauto rifles already owned by those under age 21 by prohibiting any possession or use of these rifles at target ranges and for hunting.

I-1639 creates both a literacy test and the equivalent of a poll tax--they call it a fee--to exercise a right guaranteed by both State and Federal Constitutions. You wouldn't accept this for voting or any other right and neither have the courts.

I-1639 delays the LAWFUL purchase of a rifle by 10 days--even after all background checks are passed! A right delayed is a right denied.
I-1639 impairs a citizen's defense their home by requiring that the most effective defensive firearms be locked and inaccessible by the homeowner.

I-1639 creates an unnecessary, costly and ill-considered requirement for government-mandated training that is already adequately addressed by Washington Arms Collectors-provided training, National Rifle Association safety instructors, WDFW Hunter Safety training and private clubs and ranges.

I-1639 creates yet another huge unfunded bureaucracy that will only duplicate the background checks already Federally required. Don't be fooled--the background check system already exists and all semiauto rifle buyers already are required to pass background checks.

I-1639 will prohibit legitimate sales of rifles to fully background checked and Federally-approved purchasers from other states, thus harming all State and Federally licensed firearm dealers.

I-1639 will not stop a single crime or shooting. Criminals are not subject to any of the requirements; only law-abiding citizens go through background checks and they already do so.

I-1639 wrongly burdens our most law-abiding citizens while doing nothing to keep firearms out of the hands of criminals.

"The WSLEFIA finds that I-1639 is an attack on civil rights and is an attempt to marginalize all firearm owners, including law enforcement officers. I-1639 will impair public safety, embolden criminals and impose burdensome restrictions on our most law-abiding citizens."

The GOP Needs To Grow A Backbone Fast Or We're Screwed

The screen shot above is an actual Tweet posted by Chuck Grassley on Friday. In my opinion, it also painfully captures the GOP's worst problem at this point in time: it is trying TOO hard to be nice. It is so afraid of being dishonestly branded a Nazi that is capitulating pointlessly to the Democrats at every turn.

Chuck Grassley is channeling Jimmy Carter while Carter is still alive.

Make no mistake, I do not like or have any tolerance for Nazis. That is why I decided to #WalkAway from the Democratic party, a party fanatically devoted to a ruthless enforcement of orthodoxy and intolerance of different opinions. It's just outrageous to me that the Republicans tolerate being branded fascists, when this is what passes for Democratic anti-fascist activism in 2018:

 

Maybe an infusion of #WalkAway people is what it will take to invigorate a moribund and tremulous GOP so that it actually plays to win. You are in a street fight with the Democrats and trying to fight fair in a street fight will only doom you. #WalkAway members did not leave the Democratic party to watch Republicans cave in to their demands, our civil liberties meekly given away and capitulation granted to new, idiotic taxes. We left a party that expresses only contempt for people who think differently: for people who are religious, for people who are responsible gun owners (including modern rifles and concealed handguns), for people who see the extreme social justice movement as just another venue for racism and segregation.

We're furious and you'd better start thinking like us if you intend to win.

Interested in a Political Diversity Book Club?

The political landscape of this great nation is rapidly devolving into a trivial and dangerously simplistic mess, composed of meme exchanges and rote recitation of talking points at each other instead of sincere dialogue. If we are going to prevent American from descending into the chaos of a third world banana republic, it is more critical now than ever that we the people learn how to really engage each other over issues again, rather than just emote and shout at each other.

Perhaps the worst part of all this is its futility. Most of the groups shouting at each other actually make up part of the solution for making this country even better than it already is. Liberal and conservative, red state and blue state, atheist and religious person...if they could learn to discuss their differences constructively and without fear of the accusations that doom many political conversations...what could we achieve?

What couldn't we achieve?

So what I am suggesting here is that we begin using the internet constructively to READ about a variety of viewpoints and discuss them freely and openly. If others are interested in this project, I will set up a discussion group (e.g., at goodreads.com) and we can begin nominating books. I am including a few contemporary books that are well worth reading. Depending on interest, we may also look at some classics like Thomas Paine's "Common Sense" or Thoreau's essay on civil disobedience.

I hope you will join us!

Here are a few initial book ideas ordered by publication date:

1. Free for All: Defending Liberty in America Today (link)
   By Wendy Kaminer, published in 2002, ISBN 0807044113 / 9780807044117
   
   Wendy Kaminer is an author I just discovered a couple years ago. She is sort of the Ben Shapiro of the left, fiercely principled (so much so that the ACLU drove her from their board of directors) and utterly committed to preserving freedom in America. This book looks at a number of topics from that perspective at a time when the government was  beginning to curtail freedom just after 9/11.
2. Terrorism and Tyranny: Trampling Freedom, Justice, and Peace to Rid the World of Evil (link)
   By James Bovard, published in 2003, ISBN 1403963681  / 9781403963680
   
   This book was published a year after Kaminer's book and offers another look at the the immediate post 9/11 period but from more of a libertarian than classic liberal perspective. Like Kaminer, Bovard is fiercely principled and points out anti-freedom government actions without regard to party affiliation.
   
   (Passing another anniversary of 9/11 is an excellent opportunity to contemplate whether we have sacrificed too much freedom for illusory promises of safety. I was reminded of this when listening to SOFREP Radio's 9/11 commemoration (link). SOFREP Radio is a podcast produced by members of the the military special operations community. Their comments about fighting terrorists overseas and returning home to find the civil liberties infringements we had grown to tolerate back home were a painful but necessary listen.)
3. The Coddling of the American Mind: How Good Intentions and Bad Ideas Are Setting up a Generation for Failure (link)
   By Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt, published in 2018, ASIN B076NVFT5P
   
   This book was published this year and examines the growing political partisanship in America and the dangerous extent to which we now isolate ourselves from alternative viewpoints. It was reading this book which inspired me to see if this political diversity book club could be part of the solution to America's growing tribalism...and violence.
   
   In terms of political perspective, I would classify this book as non-partisan. It examines both right and left sided orthodoxies and points out their dangerous tendencies.
4. Republican Like Me: A Lifelong Democrat's Journey Across the Aisle (link)
   By Ken Stern, published in 2017, ISBN 0062460781 (ISBN13: 9780062460783)
   
   "The former CEO of NPR set out for conservative America to find out why these people are so wrong about everything. It turns out, they weren’t."
   
   This excellent book shows how Americans can learn to understand and appreciate people who aren't like them, instead of merely treating large groups of people as the enemy. Highly recommended in this painfully Balkanized era in which we live.

 
 

If We Don't Fight, We Can't Win. And we CAN win!

The NRA is taking the fight against I-1639 into high gear now (link). Yesterday, I spent a few hours at the Washington State Fair in Puyallup handing out information about this madly overreaching initiative. The Democratic party's booth had a life size Barry Obama cutout, which offered whimsical selfie opportunities. 

Working the booth offered some great opportunities for interacting with other gun owners, some of whom weren't aware of all the awful parts of this law: classifying all semiautomatic rifles as "assault weapons", 10 day waiting period for purchase (even with CPL), lifetime surrender of HIPAA protections to the state, vague storage requirements which will make gun owners criminals if their home is burglarized.

While most visitors left fired up to vote this initiative into oblivion, the response of one baffled me. He said that he just doesn't believe in voting anymore and refused to consider even the limited step of registering to vote against this initiative. Even odder, this middle aged guy was wearing a t-shirt with the Star of David on it: if there's one group of people who can articulate what "Never Again" really comes down to, it's the population of Israel who have grown up in the company of Holocaust survivors.

Make no mistake: if a good percentage of gun owners show up and vote, we can beat this awful initiative down even harder than we beat I-676 21 years ago. If we don't even try, if the voting percentage is as lame as it was in the August primaries, the corrupt Olympia government can mount a very serious and devastating attack on what is now a very healthy and safety-oriented gun culture.

The choice is up to you. PLEASE make sure you are registered to vote right away and commit to getting your friends out to vote too. We can beat this initiative decisively but if we don't even bother fighting it, we can't win.

Why would people without the guts to fight a political fight even own guns anyway?

After Parkland: Why Nothing Changes After A Shooting Event

People wonder why steps aren't taken to improve public safety after a public shooting?
It's been nearly 7 months since the Parkland shooting. What has happened?
We found that the armed Parkland deputy specifically who was on site to keep students safe from such an event simply ran away.
We found that several other Parkland deputies stayed under cover outside while the murders continued.
We found that the killer had been investigated by the Parkland sheriff for around 40 incidents implying dangerous mental derangement and threats to others. The FBI was informed twice that he wanted to be a school shooter. He was not disarmed or taken in for psych evaluation.
Who does the Parkland sheriff blame in a CNN town hall hatefest? Dana Loesch and the NRA. People like me. The focus becomes not public safety but banning the most popular rifle in America.
Continuing through the year, a few Parkland students are lauded by the media non-stop and flown around the country to promote gun bans. Parkland survivors and parents of killed students who are less interested in gun control and more interest in a comprehensive safety approach are ignored. Even when when one student, Kyle Kashuv, helps get a comprehensive safety bill including expanded background checks passed.
How is the insanity of the blame dodging sheriff still being employed and the exclusive focus on preventing sane people from getting guns not blatantly obvious?
Is this really a pattern you want to continue repeating?